I recently read an article by a woman about what she experienced in her body, social life, etc. when she ditched her cell phone and hardwired her internet.
However, she went beyond the effects of electromagnetic radiation on people and spoke briefly about the effects it had on her pets and her friends’ pets. This motivated me to provide more data on how WiFi is damaging our plant, animal, bird and insect life on this planet. WiFi radiation is a huge part of ecosystem destabilization that most tree lovers or climate activists aren’t even aware of.
Damage to animals caused by WiFi radiation from cell phones
Frog eggs and tadpoles
In one study, the eggs and tadpoles of the common frog (Rana temporaria) were exposed to multiple cell phone antennas located 140 meters away. The study concluded:
“These results suggest that radiation emitted by telephone poles in a real-world situation can influence development and lead to disruption Increase in mortality of exposed tadpoles. This research could have a huge impact on nature, which is now exposed to high levels of microwave radiation from a variety of telephone poles.”
Cell phone antenna makes calves blind
This article from Zurich is translated here. In many countries, telecommunications companies approach farmers and pay them a lot of money (one farmer I know got $150,000) to put up a cell tower on their land. Of course, they do not inform the farmer of the possible harm that could result – neither to the farmer’s family nor to his animals.
“From 1999 to 2006 there was a cell phone antenna on Hans Rumpfenegger’s farm. Almost during that time One in three calves on the farm were born with some type of cataract. This disability led to almost complete blindness in ruminants… Fallenegger soon suspected the electromagnetic radiation from the cell phone antenna as the cause. And indeed: since the antenna is no longer in operation, the calves have been healthy again.
Scientists at the Zurich Animal Hospital have now confirmed this suspicion, as various media reported today. Veterinarian Michael Hässig told Tele Züri that the risk of eye damage for the cattle on Rumpfenegger’s farm is ten times higher. Based on the scientific findings to date, Hans Rumpfenegger sued the network operator Orange for damages.”
Cell phones and disappearing birds
From Belgium to Spain to Russia, there is increasing evidence about how electromagnetic radiation affects birds, with their thinner skulls and feathers, which can act as dielectric receptors for microwave radiation.
“Scientists at the Research Institute for Nature and Forests in Brussels, Belgium, have provided the first evidence of this Mobile phone base stations affect the reproductive behavior of wild sparrows.
Sparrows are not the only wild birds affected. In fact, telephone poles were found reduce the breeding success of white storks in Spain.
Chicken embryos exposed to cell phone radiation in the laboratory suffered much higher mortality than unexposed controls. A few years ago, researchers in Russia showed that continuous exposure of chicken embryos during the 21 days of embryonic development resulted in this 75 percent of embryos diecompared to 16 percent for controls.”
Bees, ants, birds: our planet’s ecosystems
At a Glastonbury symposium talk by Barrie Trower, he spoke about his experiences during a trip to Africa:
“During a recent visit to Africa, a gentleman led me to a field full of plants and said, “What do you hear, Barrie?” I replied, “Nothing.”
He said: “Normally you and I wouldn’t be able to hear each other right now because there would be so many bees buzzing, but since the cell phone transmitter went up we haven’t seen a single bee.”
While in Africa I received other similar reports about bees, birds and even ants. It was explained to me that ants are very important for their symbiotic relationship with plants. The plants produce a sweet substance to feed the ants, and in return the ants prevent insects from landing on and eating the plant’s leaves. Therefore, ants guarantee the safety and harvest of plants.
It seemed so The common denominator in all cases was proximity to cell phone transmitters Transmission of continuous low level microwaves and additional modulations (pulses) causes cellular stress in species within reach.
Residents who complained were told that such installations complied with “International Safety Guidelines”; other residents were either completely ignored, ridiculed or ridiculed.”
There is a wealth of data on the effects of electromagnetic radiation on bees in many countries around the world. One of the most interesting experiments was carried out by the Indian environmentalist Dr. Sainudeen Pattazhy, a professor at Sree Narayana College in Kerala. He placed a cell phone in each of six hives and turned the phone on for just ten minutes once a day for ten days. While the phone was on, the bees became quiet. The The queen’s laying rate decreased from 355 to 100 per day. After ten days there were no bees left in one of the beehives.
Cell phone test on rat brains
This article in Popular Science Magazine shows the actual damage to the brains of rats after they were exposed to a cell phone of varying intensity for two hours.
While the control brains (no radiation – see example above) appear healthy, the brains of the test subjects (brain photo below) are heavily spotted with proteins (dark spots). leaked from surrounding blood vessels and show Signs of significant neuronal damage.
Damage to oak trees
In the book Electromagnetic Environments and Health in Buildings (p. 263), Anne Silk talked about her work for the Forest Service on a very rare disease in oak trees called “Oak Die Back.” Where The tree dies from the top down instead of from the roots upas usual.
She examined over 100 sites across the UK and was able to determine the common distance between diseased trees and a tall multi-mast user (WiFi tower). This seems to suggest that such (modulated) fields affect plant hydraulics and electroosmotic processes in the trees themselves by masking natural electric fields, particularly those that occur under “fair weather” conditions.
It has already been shown that alternating or reversing fields have biological effects on humans and animals (Source: Jamieson KS, Bell NB, “Distorted Current Flow – The Forgotten Factor in EMF Research? Part 1”, European Biology and Bioelectromagnetics, 2005;1(1):1-5)
Damage to aspen trees and saplings
In one of the gold standard studies of the effects of electromagnetic radiation on trees, scientists conducted a controlled on-site experiment outside the city of Lyons, Colorado, to see how local forests were affected by human-generated Wi-Fi and cell phone radiation (towers, routers, usage, etc.) in the city.
They planted two groups of Aspen seedlings; The group on the right was completely shielded from radiation (via a Faraday cage) and the other group was not shielded at all. You can see that poor growth of irradiated seedlings:
Even with the seedlings that were not shielded, All leaves had necrotic lesionsand the leaf veins were yellow or green (should have been red on aspen):
Necrotic lesions on unshielded trees
Children are also at increased risk
I have also written many detailed posts about the effects of EMR on children. But the fundamental point to keep in mind is this Children absorb much more electromagnetic radiation than adults Do.
- The Stewart Report (2000) states that children absorb more energy from an external electromagnetic field per kg of body weight than adults. A 5 year old consumes about 60% more than an adult.
- Head models have predicted that children (under 8 years of age) absorb up to twice as much microwave radiation in peripheral brain tissue as an adult (Wiart et al., 2008).
- The strain on the bone marrow can be up to ten times higher in children than in adults (Christ, Andreas et al., 2010).
- Children have thinner skulls and their brains are more conductive. Children are still developing and will likely be exposed to more radiation over the course of their lives than any previous generation.
- I’ve been blogging about this since 2008, and back then Dr. Ronald B. Herberman, director of the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, warned his faculty and staff: Limit cell phone use because of the possible cancer risk. In the memo, which he sent to about 3,000 teachers and staff, he said children should only use cell phones in emergencies because their brains are still developing.
So what can you do?
WiFi and cell phone radiation can now be found almost everywhere. The ONLY place we can control or reduce exposure is our home. Giving our bodies at least 8 hours per day to heal and restore functionality damaged by Wi-Fi is probably our best defense against this pervasive poison. God knows you don’t want to get to the point where you become electrohypersensitive (EHS). This happened to both a doctor and an engineer I know. Life became very difficult for her very quickly.
And of course if you have babies or children or have a health problem, this is even more important Create a safe repair/healing zone in your home.
Jini Patel Thompson is an internationally recognized expert in natural healing for digestive diseases. She healed herself from widespread Crohn’s disease and has been medication and surgery free for over 25 years. Jini has appeared on numerous podcasts, TV and radio shows in the US, UK, Canada and Australia, giving people hope and vision on how to heal their colitis, Crohn’s disease, diverticulitis and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) using all-natural methods. Her books on natural healing of digestive diseases have been sold in over 80 countries worldwide. Jini is married and has three children, nine sheep, 11 horses, a cat and three dogs.
